Masculinity is, in the words of Raewyn W. Connell, a “gender project,” a dynamic and actively constructed social practice (“Gender as a Social Practice” 369). It is articulated on the site of the individual, the state, and more abstractly, ideologies and cultures. Not viewed from a biological lens as a pre-existing, natural, or static state of being, masculinity is shaped, contested, displaced, and performed. It is stratified through hierarchies of hegemonic and subordinated forms that transform with various historical processes. However, masculinities are also unstable categories, as they are constructed in opposition to an ‘other,’ often an abjected other, and are thus not inherently meaningful. As Judith Butler wrote in her pioneering text Gender Trouble , gender is a repetitive imitation, propagating an approximation of an ideal that is always out of reach because it does not exist (313). Constructions of masculinity in India are no exception. Defined in opposition to the...